<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Publications by C.R. Unelius</title>
		<link>http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/authors/read/19521</link>
		<description>Publications by C.R. Unelius</description>
		<language>en-ca</language>
		<pubDate>2004-06-03 00:00:00 MST</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>2004-06-03 00:00:00 MST</lastBuildDate>
		<webMaster>webmaster@nofc.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca</webMaster>
		        		<item>
			<title>Geographic variation in pheromone chemistry, antennal electrophysiology, and pheromone-mediated trap catch of North American populations of the obliquebanded leafroller</title>
			<link>http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/publications?id=24487</link>
			<description>The total and relative amounts of (Z)-11-tetradecenyl acetate (Z11-14:Ac), (E)-11-tetradecenyl acetate (E11-14:Ac), (Z)-11-tetradecen-1-ol (Z11-14:OH) and (Z)-11-tetradecenal (Z11-14:Al), and the EAG response of male antennae to these pheromone gland compounds were compared in laboratory reared &lt;em&gt;Choristoneura rosaceana&lt;/em&gt; Harris (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) from British Columbia, Michigan, Ontario, New York, and Quebec. A field trapping experiment was conducted in each of these locations to determine the effect of Z11-14:Al on the numbers of moths captured. The amount of each of the four pheromone-gland compounds declined successively in moths from British Columbia, Quebec, Ontario, Michigan, and New York. The relative amount of Z11-14:Ac was greatest in moths from New York and smallest in moths from Ontario, whereas the relative amount of E11-14:Ac was greatest in moths from Ontario and smallest in moths from British Columbia. Moths from Ontario, Quebec, British Columbia, Michigan, and New York contained decreasing relative amounts of Z11-14:OH and Z11-14:Al. There was a trend of increasing antennal sensitivity to each of the four pheromone-gland compounds in moths from New York, Michigan, Ontario, Quebec, and British Columbia. The addition of 1% Z11:Al to a three compound blend of Z11-14:Ac, E11-14:Ac and Z11-14:OH (97:2:1) resulted in a&gt;twofold increase in average trap catch in British Columbia, Ontario,
and Quebec; this compound had no effect on trap catch in Michigan or New York.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2004</pubDate>
			<guid>http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/publications?id=24487</guid>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>