Canadian Forest Service Publications
LiDAR sampling density for forest resource inventories in Ontario, Canada. 2012. Treitz, P.; Lim, K.; Woods, M.; Pitt, D.; Nesbitt, D.; Etheridge, D. Remote Sensing 4:830:848.
Issued by: Great Lakes Forestry Centre
Catalog ID: 33810
Availability: PDF (request by e-mail)
Available from the Journal's Web site. †
† This site may require a fee
Over the past two decades there has been an abundance of research demonstrating the utility of airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) for predicting forest biophysical/inventory variables at the plot and stand levels. However, to date there has been little effort to develop a set of protocols for data acquisition and processing that would move governments or the forest industry towards cost-effective implementation of this technology for strategic and tactical (i.e., operational) forest resource inventories. The goal of this paper is to initiate this process by examining the significance of LiDAR data acquisition (i.e., point density) for modeling forest inventory variables for the range of species and stand conditions representing much of Ontario, Canada. Field data for approximately 200 plots, sampling a broad range of forest types and conditions across Ontario, were collected for three study sites. Airborne LiDAR data, characterized by a mean density of 3.2 pulses m -2 were systematically decimated to produce additional datasets with densities of approximately 1.6 and 0.5 pulses m -2. Stepwise regression models, incorporating LiDAR height and density metrics, were developed for each of the three LiDAR datasets across a range of forest types to estimate the following forest inventory variables: (1) average height (R 2(adj) = 0.75-0.95); (2) top height (R2(adj) = 0.74-0.98); (3) quadratic mean diameter (R 2(adj) = 0.55-0.85); (4) basal area (R 2(adj) = 0.22-0.93); (5) gross total volume (R 2(adj) = 0.42-0.94); (6) gross merchantable volume (R 2(adj) = 0.35-0.93); (7) total aboveground biomass (R 2(adj) = 0.23-0.93); and (8) stem density (R 2(adj) = 0.17-0.86). Aside from a few cases (i.e., average height and density for some stand types), no decimation effect was observed with respect to the precision of the prediction of the majority of forest variables, which suggests that a mean density of 0.5 pulses m -2 is sufficient for plot and stand level modeling under these diverse forest conditions across Ontario.