Canadian Forest Service Publications
Moose browsing tends spruce plantations more efficiently than a single mechanical release. 2020. de Vriendt, L.; Thiffault, N.; Royo, A.A.; Barrette, M.; Tremblay, J.P. Forests 11(11): 1138.
Issued by: Laurentian Forestry Centre
Catalog ID: 40236
CFS Availability: PDF (request by e-mail)
Available from the Journal's Web site. †
† This site may require a fee
Forest vegetation management can improve planted seedling survival and growth and is thus widely used in plantation silviculture. In some jurisdictions, mechanical release using brushsaws has replaced the traditional use of chemical herbicides for forest vegetation management purposes. However, its associated costs and the increasing diculty of finding qualified labor represent a challenge. The browsing of competition by large herbivores may represent an alternative to mechanical release when planted seedlings are resistant to browsing. Here, we compare the ecacy of moose browsing relative to mechanical release in controlling competing vegetation and in promoting white spruce growth in plantations. In a high moose density region, we used an experimental design consisting of four pairs of moose exclosures and unfenced plots; fifty percent of both the access-restricted and unrestricted study areas received a mechanical release treatment. Moose browsing was more ecient than mechanical release in diminishing the sapling density and basal area of competing species. Mechanical release only reduced the sapling density of taller competitors (height > 201 cm), whereas browsing reduced the sapling densities of competitors across a greater size range (height > 130 cm). These eects of moose browsing on competition translated into a greater positive eect of moose browsing on the basal area of planted spruces. We attribute the higher eectiveness of moose browsing relative to mechanical release to its chronic nature. Moose browsed continuously throughout the year and for multiple years, whereas mechanical release was applied only one time between the second and fourth years after planting. Our results suggest that pairing wildlife management and silviculture decisions could be in the best interest of both the hunting and forestry industries in regions where plantations are frequent and use browse-resistant crop trees. Favouring browsers in controlling the density of competing species could increase the hunting experience and income, while providing an eective, cost-free, and socially acceptable forest vegetation management service.